Fig. 1- The Partisans
On a spring day in 2003 after having recently arrived in Massachusetts, a friend
visiting from California and I set about “seeing the city” from
one of the infamous WWII amphibious ducks on the “duck tour.” A
happy and humorous adventure, my breath was suddenly taken away from me as there,
darkening my happy mood was a stark and disturbing work of art on the common
that reached out its ethereal fist and punched me in the gut.
The
spring and trees were blooming, but none of it mattered compared to these four…
no, five… gaunt and disturbing horsemen trudging their way across the
common (fig. 1). What did it mean? As I turned around in my seat to get another
look, all I could think of was Native Americans, returning from a battle in
which they fought for their beliefs and lives. Once again, they were beaten
into retreat, starving and somber. I wasn’t entirely off-base –
the work of art known as “The Partisans” was created by sculptor
Andrzej P. Pitynski, as a tribute to guerrilla freedom fighters everywhere.
Pitynski was born in 1947 to Polish parents who were these “Partisans.”
Partisans were the names given to Jewish, Polish, and other persecuted guerilla
fighters who hid in the forests of Europe fighting the Nazis. They did the best
they could, on foot or horseback, starving and many times dying for their beliefs
that they should be able to live and enjoy the same freedoms as anyone else
(fig. 2). The term “partisan” takes on a double meaning, however.
The more morally neutral term meaning is a term meaning one who is a “volunteer
combatant” who has chosen to take sides and takes an active part in resisting.
The more negative connotations of the word, however, implies that one is a partial,
unreasoning, and at times fanatical advocate to a cause.
 |
 |
Figure 2 – Partisans
in WWII Russia, and Partisans on Boston Common |
Andrzej P. Pitynski came to the United States in 1974, and sculpted the work
in 1979. The cavalry was meant to be displayed in Warsaw, Poland, but due to
communism and the disturbing nature of the work, it was not welcomed. The work
was without a home until it was placed on the Boston Common in 1982, where is
resides today as part of the “Immigrant Heritage Trail.”
Technically on loan to the city, the sculpture was originally displayed near
Brewer Fountain across from 131 Tremont Street. According to urban legend, Kevin
White (then the mayor of Boston) didn’t like it there, and had it moved
to the common. Kevin White is not the only critic who didn’t
like the sculpture, apparently. While looking for information about the sculpture,
I came across this rather harsh assessment of the sculpture:
The heartfelt visages on the unrepentant political renegades of our late-19th-
and early-20th-century statues have been replaced by depersonalized, often
didactic abstract memorials to citizens who were wiped out...
...Partisans is intended as a tribute to guerrilla freedom fighters everywhere;
the artist, in other words, had no war, no names, nobody specific in mind.
And it reads as generic. Five bedraggled men on horseback, their postures
hyperbolic as a press release, hold their bayoneted rifles like slim, sharpened
crucifixes. Featureless and interchangeable, they register like a public-service
announcement on the dangers of overexertion.
Fig. 3 - Reaching out for... what?
At first these statements perplexed me, because it seemed perfectly obvious
that this was no “generic” work. After thinking about it,
it is true that I only understood the specificity of the work in regards to
partisans like Pitynski’s parents after having done some research. However,
the fact that it initially registered (strongly) to me as having been another
group of persecuted people with the conviction and will to keep fighting, says
to me that the idea is still there, even if it is interchangeable for whom it
stands for. In doing so, it satisfies the idea of memorializing guerrilla freedom
fighters everywhere.
A very vertical and horizontal piece, one would presume that there is not
much movement to the piece. However we see a quiet, determined plodding on,
and the horses and riders seem to be moving, even while on the edge of death.
From different angles, however, the horse’s necks crane in every direction,
seemingly seeking something out – perhaps food… rest… death?
(fig. 3)
Fig. 4 - Horses reach forward to meet the spectator
The horses struck me the most poignantly, as they are at eye-level, with such
forlorn faces that you wish to reach out and try to comfort them (fig. 4).Gaunt
and starving, you feel sorrow as their necks crane, reaching out to pick fruit
from barren and nonexistent branches. Not even the m&m candies placed in each
of their mouths (fig. 5) by some facetious passer-by subsides the overwhelming
feeling of hopelessness.
Fig. 5 - It's going to take more than M&M's...
Manes and tales hang limply, while open mouths gasp for air, or fruitlessly attempt
to cry out. Overexerted, nostrils flaring, and eye sockets empty and hollow, these
horses are a frightening site, reminding one of the Book of Revelations
in which four horsemen herald the end of the world. The spindly legs and pole-arms
jutting straight up vaguely remind one of the forests where these fighters would
hide. The rough blackened aluminum could also remind someone of the harsh elements
that would attack these vagabonds, such as rain, mud, snow and ice.
Looking up, one is dwarfed by the grim-reaper riders, sitting in their saddles
with awkward rigidity. They have no eyes – just sunken holes in their
faces, their gaze cast downward – in sleep, in weakness, in starvation,
or in weariness. In most cases, they don’t even hold on to their mount.
Awkwardly upright, with slouching bent necks, it almost gives the impression
that they are dead and strapped to their mounts and the pole-arms protruding
from the side (figure 6).
 |
 |
Fig. 6 - Head bowed in prayer? |
Fig. 7 - ...or awaiting his fate? |
Each new viewing angle also takes on new meaning. Details are left obscured, and
the entire work is left rough and implicative. From certain angles, the pole-arms
even take on a new function – a noose around the necks of these insurgents
(fig. 6), serving as a reminder of the cruel fate of any such rebel who is captured
(fig. 7). The partisans’ quest seems daunting, if not impossible, yet they
still continue forward.
Seeing this sculpture calls to mind the oppressive and
often inhumane regimes that generate such opposition. It speaks of the many
movements for freedom in the centuries since the word "partisan" was
first used in Italy to describe volunteers and freedom fighters. And it reminds
us of the passionate commitment of those who took to the mountains and forests
during the Second World War. Unlike the quislings who did the Nazis' bidding,
and the many who averted their eyes, these partisans had the nobility and the
courage to resist. The sculpture evokes, too, the humane courage of the resistance
movement in postwar Poland.
While surveying the work on the common, I was met by some British tourists,
who were equally impacted by this sculpture, and we briefly chatted about it.
“Why do you think their heads hang in such a manner?” the one gentleman
asked. “Because they’re weary!” This seemed to be the obvious
answer.
“They look hungry,” stated his wife. “Do you think they’ve
found what they are seeking?” he queries. I think for a moment and then
answer, “The battle is never over – the quest for freedom will always
continue.” The gentleman agreed, “Indeed, so it does.”
Fig. 8 - Afghani guerrilla fighters
This little repartee on the common showed me just how much impact the sculpture
had, and the influence it had on its hundreds (thousands?) of daily viewers. The
fact that this discourse took place with a citizen of another country –
one which allies itself with the United States in the common cause of freedom,
struck me as irony at its best. Both of our countries have soldiers across the
seas trying subdue partisans and citizens alike in the name of freedom, yet are
constantly amazed at their resiliency and persistence. As this sculpture conveys,
it is not easy to stop someone with a cause to fight for (fig 8). They will find
a way to trudge along and keep going.
The overwhelming consensus of the day is that it is most certainly a “powerful”
piece. In the hour or so I spent pacing around, crawling under, standing on
tip-toe, and viewing the Partisans from every angle, something besides its superficial
characteristics caught my attention - its impact and on people walking by. Except
for the very few self-absorbed or jaded city-dwellers who have no doubt passed
the spot hundreds of times, the sculpture stopped every single person or group
who walked past it. They all paused to absorb and reflect these lone and weary
horsemen on the common.
Though these works have fans and foes to varying degrees,
they are equally clear about the human toll of fighting for what one believes
in — a message both timely and timeless.
Footnotes:
Bok, Sissela.
“Excerpts from A Strategy for Peace, Chapter 1: Partisanship and Perspective
- Five Horsemen.” The Peace Prize Forum. <http://www.stolaf.edu/nppf/2000/resources/strategy.htm>
Maihos, John.
“Freedom Fighters - Polish Artist Captures the Struggle.” About
dot com. <http://boston.about.com/od/historyandnature/a/freedom_fighter.htm>
Millis, Christopher.
“The good, the bad & the ugly - An opinionated, irreverent look at Boston's
public art.” The Boston Phoenix, August 21-28, 1997. <http://www.bostonphoenix.com/archive/art/97/08/21/PUBLIC_ART.html>
Greenwood,
David Valdes. “Art and about - Ten not-to-be-missed works and exhibitions.”
The Boston Phoenix, July 23-29, 2004. <http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/dnc_04/misc/docs/documents/03988919.asp>
Photocredits:
|